Tuesday, February 12, 2013

1302.2495 (Hao Tu et al.)

Instability of flat disks with respect to the formation of twisted
ribbons in smectic-A monolayers
   [PDF]

Hao Tu, Robert A. Pelcovits
Smectic-A monolayers self-assembled from aqueous solutions of chiral fd viruses and a polymer depletant can assume a variety of shapes such as flat disks and twisted ribbons. A theoretical model based on the de Gennes model for the smectic A phase, the Helfrich model of membrane elasticity and a simple edge energy has been previously used to calculate the disk-ribbon phase diagram. In this paper we apply this model to the nucleation process of ribbons. First, we study the "rippled disks" that have been observed as precursors of ribbons. Using a model shape proposed by Meyer which includes rippling in both the in-plane and out of plane directions, we study the energetics of the disks as functions of the edge energy modulus (a measure of the polymer concentration) and the mean curvature modulus k. We find that as the edge energy modulus is reduced the radial size of the ripples grows rapidly in agreement with experimental observations. For small enough k we find that the out of plane size of the ripples grows but its value saturates at a fraction of the twist penetration depth, too small to be experimentally observable. For large k the membrane remains flat though rippled in the radial direction. Such membranes do not have negative Gaussian curvature and thus will not likely spawn twisted ribbons. We also study the creation of twisted ribbons produced by stretching the edge of a flat membrane in a localized region. In experiments using a pair of optical traps it has been observed that once the membrane has been sufficiently stretched a ribbon forms on the stretched edge. We study this process theoretically using a free energy consisting of the Helfrich and edge energies alone. We add a small ribbon-like perturbation to the protrusion producd by stretching and determine whether it is energetically favorable as a function of the size of the protrusion.
View original: http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.2495

No comments:

Post a Comment